On 4/8/2010 4:08 PM, RJack wrote:
I tried that link yesterday and it pointed to a tarball of a recent (2008 I think) version of BusyBox. That's why in my prior post I asked why the link didn't point to "BusyBox, v.0.60.3" as claimed in their frivolous infringement lawsuit.
You are deliberately lying, since the lawsuit in fact does not claim infringement of this version in particular. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
