David Kastrup wrote:
Alexander Terekhov <terek...@web.de> writes:
David Kastrup wrote:
[... Pee Jays therom ...]
a covered work, you indicate your acceptance of this License to
do
What part of YOU INDICATE ACCEPTANCE don't you understand retard
dak? ACCEPTANCE is a contract thing, idiot.
Just because the GPL states something "indicates acceptance" does not
make it so since the recipient of software may choose not even to
read the license.
The GPL license to many is like the written word of God. You should
accept it on faith alone.
You vile Heretic.
Without an explicit signing, no contract is established. However, for
the _sake_ of the redistributing party, acceptance is _assumed_,
because otherwise we are talking not about a breach of conditions,
but a criminal act:
Sincerely,
RJack :)
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
