On 4/12/2010 4:26 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Sez who?
The rights holders, by virtue of the license under which they allow the works to be copied and distributed.
I say that people who copy and distribute GPL-covered
> works must not You are not a rights holder of the work, and therefore what you say is meaningless. And I could leave out the "therefore" and still be correct. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
