On 4/12/2010 4:26 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Sez who?

The rights holders, by virtue of the license under which
they allow the works to be copied and distributed.

I say that people who copy and distribute GPL-covered
> works must not

You are not a rights holder of the work, and therefore
what you say is meaningless. And I could leave out the
"therefore" and still be correct.
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list

Reply via email to