On 4/13/2010 10:01 AM, RJack wrote:
1) The SFLC is being tried in a federal district in the Second Circuit not in the CAFC: The JMRI case would be useful as toilet paper (and nothing more) in the Second Circuit.
The reasoning of the CAFC is sound, and therefore other courts can be expected to reach the same conclusions.
"... (a) concrete and particularized and (b) actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical;..."
17 USC 504 <http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/usc_sec_17_00000504----000-.html> § 504. Remedies for infringement: Damages and profits (a) In General.— Except as otherwise provided by this title, an infringer of copyright is liable for either— (1) the copyright owner’s actual damages and any additional profits of the infringer, as provided by subsection (b); or (2) statutory damages, as provided by subsection (c). _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
