Hyman Rosen wrote:
> On 4/13/2010 11:30 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > And the contract laws (not the copyright act) provide remedies for
> > breach of established (enforcable/valid) rules you idiot.
> Copyright is its own law, and specifies the nature of
> infringement and penalties for it, including for
> injunctions to prevent further infringement. Aside
> from statutory and actual damages, copyright infringers
> are not permitted to continue infringing.

Implicit in a nonexclusive copyright license is the promise not to sue
for copyright infringement. See In re CFLC, Inc., 89 F.3d 673, 677 (9th
Cir. 1996), citing De Forest Radio Telephone Co. v. United States, 273
U.S. 236, 242 (1927) (finding that a nonexclusive license is, in
essence, a mere waiver of the right to sue the licensee for
infringement); see also Effects Associates, Inc. v. Cohen, 908 F.2d 555,
558 (9th Cir. 1990) (holding that the granting of a nonexclusive license
may be oral or by conduct and a such a license creates a waiver of the
right to sue in copyright, but not the right to sue for breach of

P.S. "Every computer program in the world, BusyBox included, exceeds the
originality standards required by copyright law."

Hyman Rosen <hyro...@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'

P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this 
fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress."

Hyman Rosen <hyro...@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'

(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list

Reply via email to