Hyman Rosen wrote: > > On 4/13/2010 12:32 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote: > > The contract laws recognize a concept called "efficient breach" which > > *encourages* breach of (enforcable) obligations if it's economically > > efficient to do so. > > However, copyright law provides for injunctions to prevent
"As a separate and distinct Twelfth Affirmative Defense and each claim for relief alleged therein, Defendant alleges that Plaintiffs claim for copyright infringement is barred under at least the provisions of 17 U.S.C. § 109(a), as Defendant was licensed and any copies alleged to be infringing were, therefore, lawfully made. " To understand it better, think of the following saga: Samsung (calling SFLC): Hello SFLC, this is Samsung calling. Please be advised that we've made 1 (ONE) BILLION copies of GPL'd material copied verbatim and/or with modifications. Please contact us within 3 (THREE) BUSINESS DAYS if you think that our copies are infringing. (After three days...) Samsung (calling SFLC again): Hello SFLC, this is Samsung calling. Please stick the GPL "permission to pass copies" in Stallman's big ass as we are going to pass our copies under 17 USC 109, thank you. Got it now, silly Hyman? regards, alexander. P.S. "Every computer program in the world, BusyBox included, exceeds the originality standards required by copyright law." Hyman Rosen <hyro...@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate' P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress." Hyman Rosen <hyro...@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate' -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss