On 4/14/2010 3:20 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
The files distributed by the defendants are not first-sale
copies, so 17 USC 109 is irrelevant.
Sez who?
The defendants offer files for download from their websites.
Their web servers create fresh copies with each download,
assuming conventional operation. Those may be created and
distributed only in compliance with the GPL.
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
