On 4/15/2010 9:43 AM, RJack wrote:
The statement ". . . (a) Plaintiffs’ copyrights are unique and valuable property whose market value is impossible to assess, . . ." automatically establishes the fact that any alleged injury is "conjectural and hypothetical". The SFLC lawyers have pleaded their clients right out of Court.
Unfortunately for you, the court does not agree with you: <http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/08-1001.pdf> The choice to exact consideration in the form of compliance with the open source requirements of disclosure and explanation of changes, rather than as a dollar-denominated fee, is entitled to no less legal recognition. Indeed, because a calculation of damages is inherently speculative, these types of license restrictions might well be rendered meaningless absent the ability to enforce through injunctive relief. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss