Hyman Rosen wrote: [...] > > Undisputed fact 2) No court has ever granted *any* relief requested by > > any BusyBox plaintiff -- ever. > > This is because the defendants agree to comply with the GPL, > and therefore there is no further matter for the court to > decide. This is exactly how the GPL is designed to work.
Yeah, yeah. http://www.terekhov.de/BestBuy-Answer.pdf "FIRST COUNTERCLAIM DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT 9. Best Buy restates and realleges each of the allegations set forth in the Counterclaim paragraphs 1-8 above. 10. By filing the instant Complaint, Plaintiffs have purported to assert a claim for copyright infringement by Best Buy of copyrights in BusyBox. 11. Best Buy has not infringed any copyrights in BusyBox. 12. Best Buy is entitled to judgment that it has not infringed any copyrights in BusyBox." regards, alexander. P.S. "Every computer program in the world, BusyBox included, exceeds the originality standards required by copyright law." Hyman Rosen <hyro...@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate' P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress." Hyman Rosen <hyro...@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate' -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
