Hyman Rosen wrote: > > On 4/20/2010 4:55 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote: > > "Breach of Third-Party Beneficiary Contract > > [1] Elements and Case Citations > > (1) Defendant and a third-party entered a valid contract; > > (2) Plaintiff is not a party to the contract; > > (3) The parties to the contract intended that the contract primarily > > or directly benefit plaintiff or a class of parties of which plaintiff > > is a member; > > (4) The contract is breached; > > (5) Plaintiff suffered damages as a result of the breach. > > Why are you describing this?
Because that's the right way to enforce third-party beneficiary contracts, silly Hyman. > no such suits with respect to the GPL or other open licenses. And thus no enforcement and hence no compliance, you retard. http://news.slashdot.org/story/09/11/10/1540242/SFLC-Finds-One-New-GPL-Violation-Per-Day "News: SFLC Finds One New GPL Violation Per Day" LOL. regards, alexander. P.S. "Every computer program in the world, BusyBox included, exceeds the originality standards required by copyright law." Hyman Rosen <hyro...@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate' P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress." Hyman Rosen <hyro...@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate' -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss