Hyman Rosen wrote:
> 
> On 6/17/2011 9:35 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > SFLC claimed "settlements" without documentation and you were
>  > agreeingly happy with such claims. Why the difference now, Hyman?
> 
> Because . . . [blah blah]

>From google:

"Another BusyBox victory for SFLC - SPTechWeb
7 Mar 2008 ... High-Gain Antennas had been sued by the SFLC in the U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of New York, on behalf of
BusyBox ...
www.sysmannews.com/SearchResult/31807 - Cached
BusyBox Developers Agree To End GPL Lawsuit Against Verizon ...
17 Mar 2008 ... The Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC) today announced
that ... Actiontec has agreed to appoint an Open Source Compliance
Officer within its ...
www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2008/.../busybox-verizon/ - Cached -
Similar
BusyBox Developers and Xterasys Corporation Agree to Settle GPL ...
17 Dec 2007 ... BusyBox is a lightweight set of standard Unix utilities
...
www.softwarefreedom.org/.../busybox-xterasys-settlement/ - Cached -
Similar
Show more results from softwarefreedom.org
BusyBox developers reach settlement with Xterasys
18 Dec 2007 ... In an announced yesterday, the SFLC reveals that the
BusyBox ... appoint an internal open source compliance officer to
oversee the company's ...
arstechnica.com/.../busybox-developers-reach-settlement-with-xterasys.ars
- Cached
Best Buy, Samsung, And Westinghouse Named In SFLC Suit Today [LWN.net]
14 Dec 2009 ... The SFLC confirmed BusyBox violations in nearly 20
separate products .... to appoint a GPL compliance officer so it doesn't
happen again. ...
lwn.net/Articles/366467/ - Cached - Similar"

Stop being utter idiot, Hyman.

regards,
alexander.

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Reply via email to