Mark Wielaard, le ven. 25 oct. 2019 12:20:11 +0200, a ecrit: > Right. I think what is being objected to is a GNU Social Contract that > would contain something like this part of the Debian Social Contract > https://www.debian.org/social_contract > > We acknowledge that some of our users require the use of works > that do not conform to the Debian Free Software Guidelines. We > have created "contrib" and "non-free" areas in our archive for > these works. The packages in these areas are not part of the > Debian system, although they have been configured for use with > Debian. We encourage CD manufacturers to read the licenses of the > packages in these areas and determine if they can distribute the > packages on their CDs. Thus, although non-free works are not a > part of Debian, we support their use and provide infrastructure > for non-free packages (such as our bug tracking system and > mailing lists). > > And I would absolutely agree. That is definitely not something that > would be acceptable for the GNU Social Contract.
Sure, that's precisely why I previously wrote "I'm not saying the Debian Social Contract in particular, there are point in there which the GNU project doesn't agree on ; I am saying a document with the same type of content: writing down the MUST principles of the project". Samuel
