* Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@gnu.org> [2019-10-24 16:55]: > What is important here is this: > > > And that is the exact type word wiggling that we shouldn't accept > > here, and the exact reason why this project is run the way it is run. > > And that is where a social contract would allow to enforce it, without > the need for stubborn governance which hurts in other ways.
Stubborn governance which hurts in other way? How did it hurt you? > Stubbornness can also, but it is also detrimental for other parts of the > GNU project. That looks to me as introduction of fear, uncertainty and doubt (FUD)[1] Instead of making generalized statements, could you please be very specific about "stubborn governance which hurts in other ways" and how "Stubbornness can also, but it is also detrimental for other parts of the GNU project."? Waiting for your answer. Footnotes: [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear,_uncertainty_and_doubt -- Thanks, Jean Louis
