* nipponmail: > It does not matter how common this way of doing buisness is. > It is still a blatant violation of the Copyright holders terms. > > The Copyright holder has allowed GrSecurity to do something they, by > default, have no right to do (create and distribute [non-seperable] > derivative works), ONLY if they follow the Copyright holder's > directives.
What if they do precisely that? I don't think their subscription agreement is publicly available, so we cannot tell. All we know at this point is that they have stopped distributing source code to the general public. Under the GPL, they are under no obligation to do that.
