Brandon Invergo <bran...@gnu.org> wrote: > Dmitry Alexandrov writes: >> Iʼm afraid, you conflated two points. Publicity that undermine the core >> competency of an organization — yes, is perhaps is the most harmful thing >> for it. >> >> While negative publicity on irrelevant topics is either much less harmful, >> or sometimes even beneficial. >> >> Dr. Stallman has been always, in almost every his speech, pointed out, that >> in terms of publicity everything is still so bad, that he has to struggle to >> make it known that GNU and free software movement in general merely exist. >> And that they are not the same as Linux® and ‘open source’, in particular. >> >> Under that conditions, any kind of public attention to GNU should be >> welcoming. > > As I previously requested, please let's drop discussions of particular > people, especially when it comes to what they said or did outside of GNU. I > know you are not attacking but standing in rms's defense
No, I actually did not defend him specifically. If Sandra have posted her rant not here, but in some place where it could reach those who are unaware of free software, I would present the very same arguments in her defence.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
