* Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> [2019-11-05 23:57]: > Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 at 11:13:57PM +0300, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote: > >> > We want to give everyone the opportunity to contribute to our efforts on > >> > any of the many tasks that require work. We welcome all contributors… > >> > >> Many GNU subprojects value ‘recordkeeping’ (per Prof. Moglen [2]) and > >> ‘protection for FSF’ (per @a...@gnu.org [3]) more than giving anyone an > >> opportunity to contribute. Are you calling for change in priorities? If > >> yes, I would appreciate it, if you name few concrete steps. > > > > No change of priorities, I think, but promoting non-discrimination and > > inclusiveness. The emphasis is on give *opportunity* to contribute (...) > > *regardless* of their gender etc. (...) *harassment-free* (...). It does > > not mean that bad contributions need to be accepted, or those where the > > copyright assignments are not done correctly, and so on. > > So thatʼs exactly what I was afraid of. > > Instead of making GNU more welcoming place by lessening the burden of > formalities, you in fact propose GNU to withdraw deeper into itself by > inventing ideology-driven ‘contracts’. And in order to add an insult to > injury — to cover it with Western buzzwords like ‘inclusiveness’. :-\
Quote from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_exclusion#Social_inclusion "Social exclusion, marginalization or social marginalisation is the social disadvantage and relegation to the fringe of society. It is a term used widely in Europe and was first used in France." But GNU was never discriminatory. If anyone claims different, give me the facts. Jean
