>> Where could we host a wiki like this without causing confusion with >> official project content? > > Unless that decision changes, any wiki discussed here is necessarily > unofficial and any proposed content is in no way implicitly endorsed or > supported by the GNU Project.
If weâre going meta, then we should start discussing what âofficialâ means. And IMO, thatâs the whole point: itâs time to define it. What Chief GNUisance says is what is offical. It hasn't changed in over 30 years.
