> You have been mislead, the website you are refering to is unaffiliated
> with the GNU project, and does not represent the GNU project.
Everyone who works on GNU can and should represent the GNU project, so
itâs in fact you whoâs misleading other participants.
I specified the web site, nothing about who works on what. That
website is not affiliated with the GNU project, nor does it represent
the views of the GNU project.
You are also mistaken that one "should" represent the GNU project, we
have never required members to share the GNU project philosophy. We
hope they share the ideals of the free software movement, but they
don't need to, nor do we request them to do so.
> In other words, there is no such thing as a GNU social contract, and
> the GNU project won't be taking any such steps to adopt this text.
There isnât yet since itâs not yet been adopted, but as the acceptance
grows it eventually will be.
That isn't the case at all, nor how the GNU project is governed. I
suggest you read:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-misc-discuss/2020-02/msg00014.html
