This is try two... my previous mail did not come back, so I looked at the archive of this mailing list and also there it is missing. Then I compared the archive with my the mails that I received on the mailinglist (I never delete any mail) and it seems that archive is selective in what it archives? Or am I wrong?
Anyway - here is what I replied before (this time leaving out the quote): ==========begin of what is missing from archive=========== From: Carlo Wood <ca...@alinoe.com> To: a...@gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Cc: gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org Subject: Re: [r...@gnu.org: What's GNU -- and what's not] Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 18:12:14 +0100 X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) On Thu, 06 Feb 2020 01:36:07 -0500 a...@gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) wrote: > The GNU Project is sending this message to each GNU package > maintainer. > > You may have recently received an email asking you to review a > document titled "GNU Social Contract" and then to endorse it or reject > it. It does not entirely accord with the GNU Project's views. It was > created by some GNU participants who are trying to push changes > on the GNU Project. I stand by RMS for obvious reasons. If he says this is a bad thing, then it is a bad thing. Hence I reject it (actually, I just ignore it) and move on to other things. Have a good day, Carlo Wood (author of countless GPL-ed things) =====the rest of the quote is not repeated this time=====
