You make grandiose claims about the demise of the GNU project and the
FSF, but you do not back up it with anything of substance, and
continue with falsehoods.

You don't even raise any actual points as to how the GNU project can
become better, rather you point some minor technical decisions that
didn't fall the way you wish to dictate these dicussions.  

If anything, a discussion about the GNU project should start with what
the head of the project has actually decided -- so why not quote the
"What's GNU -- and what's not" in your non-GNU anti-social edict?

A wiki, a public disucssion, etc are not solutions to how we tackle
the future.

Reply via email to