You make grandiose claims about the demise of the GNU project and the FSF, but you do not back up it with anything of substance, and continue with falsehoods.
You don't even raise any actual points as to how the GNU project can become better, rather you point some minor technical decisions that didn't fall the way you wish to dictate these dicussions. If anything, a discussion about the GNU project should start with what the head of the project has actually decided -- so why not quote the "What's GNU -- and what's not" in your non-GNU anti-social edict? A wiki, a public disucssion, etc are not solutions to how we tackle the future.
