Hi Dmitry, Dmitry Gutov <dgu...@yandex.ru> skribis:
> On 20.02.2020 11:47, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> I think it’s important for GNU hackers as a group to be able to reflect >> on the project’s procedures and discuss whether/how to improve them. > > So what GNU hackers who disagree with you lot on this or other > subjects are supposed to do? They can choose to ignore the Social Contract, or better yet, they can let us know they do not endorse it and (ideally) why. It’s a process. > I don't see the opposing viewpoints reflected in your documentation > anywhere. You have formed a subgroup, discussed your views in private, > and are now soliciting positive feedback within the project, while > largely ignoring negative one. This is wrong. See the timeline at: https://wiki.gnu.tools/gnu:gsc-feedback > And you're misrepresenting yourselves as a project-wide official > initiative. "We are GNU, and here are our values". Our first message¹ to maintainers started with: The authors of this message have started an effort […] I don’t think there’s any misrepresentation. Thanks, Ludo’. ¹ https://wiki.gnu.tools/git/gnu-tools-wiki/tree/code/sc-email.txt
