On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 08:50:44 -0800, Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss) wrote: > On 2020-02-22 19:38, Mike Gerwitz wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 20:48:43 +0100, Andreas Enge wrote: >>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 10:26:22AM -0800, Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss) >>> wrote: >>>> On 2020-02-22 01:22, Andreas Enge wrote: >>>> > And another ad-hominem attack. Can you substantiate the claim of us >>>> > being >>>> > powermongers? >>>> >>>> https://wiki.gnu.tools/wiki:code-of-conduct >>>> "Enforcement", "Ban", "Correction", "Warning" .... >>>> You are sick. >>> >>> Could I kindly ask for this person to be put on moderation? I find it >>> difficult to interpret the last statement as anything but a gratuitous >>> insult >>> (following a message that was not even directed at them). Notice that >>> there >>> is a pattern of overly aggressive messages by Kaz Kylheku. >> >> I think we can handle this without having to resort to blocking a >> person's messages. >> >> Kaz, please avoid use of subjective terms like "powermonger" and focus > > Everything you see here has passed moderation. > > If you don't think I should be able to include quotes of someone > else's text that contains "powermonger", take it up with the moderator.
I'm very sorry---I meant to reply to the "you are sick". I was considering multiple moderation messages at once and they somehow got mixed. I am one of the moderators on this list. >> https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/kind-communication.html > > I think that is useful for communication within projects themselves. > I don't think that should be blindly followed in a self-defeating way > by remaining meek when the project is under attack. The guidelines do not say "be kind unless ...". -- Mike Gerwitz
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
