* Jean Louis: > That is right, that is where should AGPL maybe be updated. > > We know from GPL that when there is some software that depends on GPL > software, then such has to be issued under GPL as well. Those could be > some modules, even if distributed separately they may form a part of > the whole.
But the GPL makes an exception for code in the “System Library” category. Service infrastructure is similar to that. Maybe the System Library exception is outdated. But I think the GNU project considers outreach to people using proprietary software important, and redistributable binaries need that System Library exception.
