> There is nothing insidious with such a paint
And yet, free software rhetoric emphatically characterizes nonfree as "causing harm in a way that is gradual or not easily noticed," which is Merriam-Webster's definition of "insidious." No, it doesn't. You do not qualify what is non-free. Non-free _software_ does harm to society, and users. There is little to dispute. In either case, this list is for serious discussion about the GNU project, etc, and not trolling -- please find some other place to do that.
