Hi again,
this one is more a matter of taste than my bug report today.
I know I reported this some months ago, but I was misunderstood
somehow. The current behaviour is better than the one I complained
about, then, though.
Please look at this:
\score { \notes
\relative c' {
\repeat volta 3
{
c1
}
\alternative
{{
f f2 f2
}
{
b b4 b4 b4 b4
}
{
es es8 es8 es8 es8 es8 es8 es8 es8
}}
as
}
\midi{}
\paper{}
}
The current implementation is the sequential graphical order:
c'1,
f'1, f'2, f'2,
b'2, b'4 b'4 b'4,
es''4, es''8,...
as''8
IMHO, it would be better if the order would be the real (musical,
temporal) order: refer the alternatives back to the last note of
the repeated music, and the note after the alternatives to the last
note of the last alternative:
c'1,
f'1, f'2, f'2,
b1, b4, b4, b4, b4,
es'1, es'8,...
as'8
But: would this be easily implemented after all? Would this break
much existing music? (not that this has been a criterion, so far ;-) )
What do you think?
Greetings, Dirk.
--
Dirk Lattermann | Information is not knowledge | Beauty is not love
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Knowledge is not wisdom | Love is not music
Bonn, Germany | Wisdom is not truth | Music is THE BEST
| Truth is not beauty | (Frank Zappa)
