[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> When you change the same property a lot of times it is easiest to use
> \set \set \set \set - but the manual dictates you to use
> \override \set \set \set \revert .... - since it claims that lily "may"
> crash if the stack runs empty.
> Is this really true? Is it really dangerous to use "\set \set \set
> \set"? (If I do not pop anything afterwards)
it can be dangerous to do \override too often. \set is safe. Which
part of the manual did you find vague exactly?
>
> -Rune
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnu-music-discuss mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-music-discuss
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen/
_______________________________________________
Gnu-music-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-music-discuss
