On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> >
> > > Finally, I hope that 1.4 will be much better and much more stable than
> > > 1.2. I also hope that we'll go off with wild development (i.e. 1.5)
> > > pretty soon after the release.
> >
> > Just briefly, are there going to be any revolutionary structural
> > changes in 1.5 (like the Scheme in 1.3), or is it going to be more
> > evolutionary, continual enhancement of the features?
>
> Jan and I always joke how each new release boldly breaks what has not
> been broken before, but I'm afraid that the changes in 1.5 will be
> less drastic. But we'll try to be revolutionary anyway :-)
I don't mind which, as long as it's enhancing (and so far, your track
record for enhancing is exemplary :) ).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
| Name: Tim Nelson | Because the Creator is, |
| E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | I am |
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Web: Temporarily unavailable
----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----
Version 3.1
GCS d? s: a-- C++>++++$ US+ P++ L++ E- W+++ N+ w+> M-- V- Y+>++
PGP->++ R(+) !tv B++ DI++++ D+ G e>++ h!/* y-
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
_______________________________________________
Gnu-music-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-music-discuss
