Astelehena 12 Ekaina 2006 17:39(e)an, Alfred M. Szmidt(e)k idatzi zuen: > I think that the GNU system must implement a new package system > that makes use of all these features (stowfs, etc..), that was the > reason why we start writting the STUT. > > I must be missing something, stowfs and the GNU System Creator are > doing this already for quite some time, so this cannot be why you > started writting STUT (maybe I'm confusing you with someone else, but > I seem to recall that we discussed GSC/stowfs a while back). > > How is STUT different from GSC/stowfs?
I'm missing something too. It's been talked about apt, emerge and yum. Why is this needed if it's been already solved? I mean, which is the difference between those package systems and pkgsrc? The idea of stut is to merge pkgsrc + stow. IIRC stowfs doesn't work yet, there's stow written in guile in the meantime. > Why wasn't this discussed here before any new uncoordinated efforts > were started? > > Is there a possibility of merging the projects together? > > Cheers. > > > _______________________________________________ > gnu-system-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-system-discuss -- Alfredo Beaumont Sainz http://www.alfredobeaumont.org/blog.cgi _______________________________________________ gnu-system-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-system-discuss
