On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 10:56:52AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 03:54:22PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > > > GNU 0.3 has to be at least on par with the bumpiest GNU/Linux > > distributions out there a couple of years. "But GNU 0.2 was even > > worse" isn't going to be accepted as excuse. > > Bullshit. 0.3 is just that: 0.3. Anyone who puts expectations into a 0.3 > release beyond surpassing 0.2, is a moron, and really deserves > disappointment.
Are you calling me a moron? Michael
