> (how can you say âa thing A is more important than an other > thing B, therefore we have to put more effort on A than Bâ, if > B can influence A, more than A can influence B, and this > applied to a really complex development ecosystem?) and > > Nobody is saying that A is more important than B.
Not exactely, but itâs close to say A has priority on B, and at the end it has the same consequences. It is no such thing. > forcing Hurd to follow and implement POSIX and other depassed > standards. > > The Hurd is not forced to follow any standards, nor is POSIX a > "depassed" standard. POSIX is a very good base for all things UNIX. Pipes are a nightmare on Hurd I heard. I donât remind if it was braurn or youpi who said me POSIX was a big constraint and that with the Hurd revolutionary architecture there were far better way to do things than as theyâre done with POSIX. Being a constraint is not the same thing as forcing anyone to follow POSIX. Nor are pipes a "nighmare" in the Hurd, that is just silly talk.
