Dne 15. 10. 19 v 21:56 Svante Signell napsal(a): > As you know there is > only one _upstream_ of systemd and that upstream is a company. Systemd > software is developed by that company, and as you also know is that > contributions, patches and bug reports coming from outside that company > are frown upon. People reporting issues are even met with hostility.
I agree that systemd has quality/complexity issues, but it is not vendor lock-in. It is free software so you can fork it – and if your fork would be better, distributions would use it and Red Hat would stay alone with their original systemd. Free software does not mean that every patch must be accepted. If it would accept everything, it would be total mess with many unintentional or even intentional bugs and flaws. It is the author/maintainer of given project, who is responsible for the quality. And if author's view diverges too much from the user's view, it is time to fork. Franta
