Hello Al,
>> 3) pass original EVAL_BM_MODEL to new_common() in "this" to >> call new constructors, which will create properly >> initialized objects ad> This is incorrect because EVAL_BM_MODEL contains no information, ad> only placeholders. The correct values are in the daughter ad> object, which would be wiped out when the placeholder is copied ad> over it. May be we speak about different things. I speak about _temp_c value (as an example). It is initialized for EVAL_BM_MODEL during precalc_first() and then it is lost when EVAL_BM_MODEL is converted into EVAL_BM_SEMI_RESISTOR during expand(). please test that. Regards Gena -- Best regards, Gserdyuk mailto:[email protected] _______________________________________________ Gnucap-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucap-devel
