Hi Felix, On 05/11/2013 02:52, Felix Salfelder wrote: > have you tried the autotools build system? (i havent pushed it to > savannah yet, as it's still experimental, find it on tool [1])
No, but that's because of my personal incompetence with Autotools. I'm sorry I didn't figure out that your experimental branch existed. Would it be possible for you to push it to a branch of Savannah? > it looks like a list of files rather than a build system. is that > intended? there is no configure script. how is this supposed to be used? All of the configuration is supposed to happen within CMakeLists.txt, but I got lost trying to interpret the old build system and instead relied on the README file. Sorry! > library names typically start with "lib", so there should be no trouble. It's a limitation with CMake: you build a library with: add_library(name SHARED <sources>) and it produces a "libname.so". Likewise, you build an executable with: add_executable(name <sources>) Which unfortunately produces a name conflict with the library name. > the build system should at least implement what the upstream build > system does. please explain how to configure yours, how CMakeLists will > call modelgen.... I agree. The only reason I tried out CMake was because I assumed Gnucap didn't have another build system. Now that there's autotools, I really don't see a point to continue work on the CMake build system. In summary, I didn't realize that work was going on with another build system. I would really appreciate it if you could push your branch to Savannah so more people could find it. If anyone decides that having a CMake build system would be a good idea, I will be glad to help out. Thanks, Kevin Zheng _______________________________________________ Gnucap-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucap-devel
