On 08/05/2013 01:41, Felix Salfelder wrote: > you can do "git push repo :branch" to delete "branch" from the remote > "repo".
That is done; "cmake-WIP" is now one commit ahead of "master". > what's more important: do you agree on the way i thing patchlev.h should > work? is this feasible with CMake? i think all build systems should > (approximately) do the same... I already have patchlev.h working. After I rebased my work off of master, I just need to copy the autotools-WIP version of patchlev.h and put it in somewhere. I was thinking; should version information be stored in a separate object file rather than a header? When the version information changes, it forces 'make' to rebuild most/all of the source files. This makes it impossible to benefit from 'make' dependency tracking or ccache. Tell me what you think. Thanks, Kevin Zheng _______________________________________________ Gnucap-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucap-devel
