On Tuesday 17 September 2013, Felix Salfelder wrote: > also, the initial op has control 1, not 0 (1=scUSER looks > better to me), so the tests still 'fail'.
That's what I meant by "questionable" .. different but not necessarily wrong. The old code didn't have that feature, so dc had stepcause always 0. On Tuesday 17 September 2013, Felix Salfelder wrote: > > Questionable regressions: > > Some tests, most notably trcurve*, give different > > results. At first glance, the differences seem > > insignificant, might be an improvement, but this needs to > > be explained. > > the initial guess is different. in non pathological cases > this guess it closer, but that doesnt mean the accepted > solution will be better... need to examine closely. Likely, new and old could be equally good, both within tolerance, so the regression test just says that something changed. _______________________________________________ Gnucap-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucap-devel
