On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 12:34:10AM -0500, al davis wrote: > > verilog > > res X(1,2);. > > That statement is ambuguous.
> This part of spice syntax doesn't have a counterpart in verilog > syntax. yes. what do you suggest? raise an exception? i do not care too much, but it should not segfault :) > It is not a link back to the kind of device it matches, so that > code is incorrect. agreed. > The real problem is that the constructor MODEL_SEMI**** is > defective, so it should be fixed there. The purpose of > _component_proto is exactly this, so the constructor must > initialize it. hmm which value for _component_proto would be correct? if i don't want an unconditional resistor, then i will have to catch the null pointer somewhere within MODEL_CARD. > [..] > I think for the future we should consider eliminating the > MODEL_CARD hierarchy completely. sounds reasonable. and as a consequence "res X(1 2);" will no longer run into the spice "model"... regards felix _______________________________________________ Gnucap-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucap-devel
