On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 02:00:02PM -0500, al davis wrote: > So I made another test case that adds a node. gnucap-uf then > gave wrong answers because of a mismatch because the subcircuit > wasn't remapped. I have some ideas, but for now losing the > probes is less of a problem than the alternatives.
thanks for the analysis. the frozen flag, that i forgot about. this once amended a related issue. but sure, it's just a hack :(. i'll look into your new test some time. > Not really surprising. autotools does a lot, all mixed up, in a > very complex way that is impossible to test adequately. yes. it would still be good to have the useful fraction of this lot on our side. i don't believe in miracles, like an implementation without autotools. it's a bit sad that you want to get rid of it before we have a replacement -- no matter if it exists. similarly: i sometimes use gcc to compile stuff. i often use processors to compute something. there's no way to test everything, even if such practice might reveal some bugs. cheers felix _______________________________________________ Gnucap-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucap-devel
