On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 03:54:10AM -0400, al davis wrote: > On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 08:39:30 +0200 > Felix Salfelder <[email protected]> wrote: > > this is along the lines of porting autotools features to the Make{1,2,3} > > files. it is meant to work for everyone, and the packaging will become > > more straightforward... what do you think? > > Try it, in a branch, so I can see it.
Hi Al. see the libtool branch. some notes: - i have no idea, what the cross-platform implications are. and i don't know, how the build system is meant to work, hence i tried to add this *as an option* first. - there's one option "--prefix" already. the --with-libtool flag and its data flow is aligned to that. i don't know how sucessful this is. - most parts are implemented various times. it might make some sense to deduplicate. i tried not to. - libtool raises portability issues upon linking plain object files into a libtool library. hence i added a rule to compile .lo (libtool object) instead. - the library version is initialized to 0:0:0. we should probably agree on a higher one... if this is working for you, we might want to include libtool, and default to --with-libtool, maybe just remove the non-libtool implementation... later. cheers felix _______________________________________________ Gnucap-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucap-devel
