On Wed, Jun 23, 1999 at 07:19:53PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It's been rumoured that Rob Browning said:
> >
> > Matt Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > I've already removed the GUI dependent stuff from
> > > include/gnc-common.h and stuck it into a new gnc-guitypes.h
> > > file. Should I continue along these lines or do others think it
> > > is unecessary?
> >
> > I'm all in favor of this kind of factorization as long as
> > factorizing doesn't make the code overly baroque. Here it sounds
> > like a good idea.
>
> Hmm. I might agree if this was a big file but this was a tiny file.
> I'm against too much filename-churn, esp like what we've seen in the
> gtk versions since it makes it hard to maintain, hard to debug, hard
> to learn the source (every time you think you knew where something
> was, it moves on you), never mind that change for the sake of change
> is just a way of injecting bugs.
>
> I'd much rather see folks think about grand new features & worry
> about cleanliness of design when they're first coded; time better
> spent than trying to go back and make cosmetic changes for the sake
> of some kind of purity.
I'm not sure what you're talking about. The moving the GUI dependent
stuff in gnc-common.h into my new gnc-guitypes.h?
----- %< -------------------------------------------- >% ------
The GnuCash / X-Accountant Mailing List
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
put "unsubscribe gnucash-devel [EMAIL PROTECTED]" in the body
