[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> This may not be quite as "pretty" as what I was thinking of, but
> certainly sounds fine for now.  It certainly passes the UNIX
> Philosophy "80% rule" of providing 80% of the functionality that I
> was hoping for.  Furthermore, it looks to be more widely reusable,
> which is a Good Thing.

Right, I'd rather get generally useful now, and pretty later.

> I drafted up a little example to check it out, and gather that it's
> not in the current CVS archives.

You mean the function I described?  No, not hardly.  That one went
straight from my brain to the email.  If I get some time, I might see
if I can cobble it up.

Anyone else who's interested and knows enough GNOME should feel free
to speak up take it over instead.  If you can provde a C level
implementation that even gets close (as long as you don't rely on
statics or globals), I can do the rest (on the scheme side) in a big
hurry.  Ask me first, though so we don't duplicate effort, and so I
can make sure your design won't be a mismatch with the necessary
scheme bits.

-- 
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930
----- %< -------------------------------------------- >% ------
The GnuCash / X-Accountant Mailing List
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
put "unsubscribe gnucash-devel [EMAIL PROTECTED]" in the body

Reply via email to