On Fri, 13 Aug 1999 19:43:53 PDT, the world broke into rejoicing as
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Fri, 13 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > It would be fairly sensible to split GnuCash into a "server engine" and a
> > "display engine," and have these run in separate processes. Adding in
> > an ORB process, or a "message server," would be at the edges of "what
> > is sensible." Moving on to an RDBMS would be dramatic overkill for the
> > limited data requirements, and would add considerably to the complexity.
>
> Eep! Okay, okay. No need to bite my head off. It was just an observation.
I didn't mean to get overly testy about it; the question has come up again
and again since about 1994, and I'd rather quash the "Let's do it using
SQL" issue instantly rather than have all of the same (perhaps new to you,
but rather tired to some of us) arguments repeat over a period of days.
Things like "Tree Based" sound more likely to prove fruitful as truly
"new" ideas. (Albeit older than MS Windows :-).)
--
ITS is a hand-crafted RSUBR.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <http://www.hex.net/~cbbrowne/lsf.html>
----- %< -------------------------------------------- >% ------
The GnuCash / X-Accountant Mailing List
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
put "unsubscribe gnucash-devel [EMAIL PROTECTED]" in the body
