> Not planned. I think the overall idea is to move the swig/perl stuff > off into its own partition, and if configure can't find the right > bits, it just doesn't get built. Or perhaps we should just have a > --enable-perl so you have to ask for it. Ok, that makes sense. It will make gnucash easier to build. On a related note, can you build without nana? Has anyone used nana? Right now, we just seem to be using it as a replacement for 'assert'. dave -- Gnucash Developer's List To unsubscribe send empty email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Java implementation Derek Atkins
- Re: Java implementation Rob Browning
- Re: A bit off topic---Java as "SUN's lang... Rob Browning
- Re: Perl in internals (was Re: A bit off t... Rob Browning
- Re: Perl in internals (was Re: A bit o... James A. Treacy
- Re: Perl in internals (was Re: A ... linas
- Re: Perl in internals (was Re... Dave Peticolas
- Re: Perl in internals (was Re... Rob Browning
- Re: Perl in internals (was Re... Dave Peticolas
- Re: Perl in internals (was Re... Rob Browning
- Re: Perl in internals (was Re... Dave Peticolas
- Re: Perl in internals (was Re... Rob Browning
- Re: Perl in internals (was Re... linas
- Re: Perl in internals (was Re... Dave Peticolas
- Re: Perl in internals (was Re... linas
- Maybe Coming Time to XML? Christopher Browne
- Re: Perl in internals (was Re... Rob Browning
- Re: Perl in internals (was Re... linas
- Re: Perl in internals (was Re... Rob Browning
- Re: Perl in internals (was Re... Tim Mooney
- Re: Perl in internals (was Re... Dave Peticolas
