Having RPMS would be a good thing, but you should also distribute the
non-native-RedHat RPMS that you'll need as well.  For example, you
should also distribute nana and XmHTML RPMS, in particular the RPMS
against which you built GnuCash.

-derek

Jeremy Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> 
> 
> Over the last month several people have contributed a lot to Gnucash
> giving the Gnome version an advantage over the Motif version.  So what
> next you ask?  Well it seems like we are approaching a point at which we
> should release a new version ( beta/alpha/test ) of Gnucash so the
> masses that do not, and will not use CVS versions can check it out.  I
> believe Linas will probably cook up a 1.3.x for soon.. Linas?
> 
> I think that before we officially release anything that we make RPMS,
> TGZ, DEB, etc... Does anyone else agree with this?  And if so can we get
> some suggestions for coordinating such a massive amount of binary
> building?  How do other projects do this?  Considering that Gnucash is
> difficult to compile in most peoples eyes we should at least attempt to
> distribute some binaries.  Maybe we could use VMware to install several
> different distributions, then build for them?  Just throwing out
> ideas...
> 
> By the way, the RPMS that are on Gnucash.org are by far the most
> downloading file!  So its obvious what people want.
> 
> Feedback?
> 
> -- 
> Jeremy Collins
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> --
> Gnucash Developer's List 
> To unsubscribe send empty email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

-- 
       Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
       Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board  (SIPB)
       URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/      PP-ASEL      N1NWH
       [EMAIL PROTECTED]                        PGP key available

--
Gnucash Developer's List 
To unsubscribe send empty email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to