Having RPMS would be a good thing, but you should also distribute the
non-native-RedHat RPMS that you'll need as well. For example, you
should also distribute nana and XmHTML RPMS, in particular the RPMS
against which you built GnuCash.
-derek
Jeremy Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> Over the last month several people have contributed a lot to Gnucash
> giving the Gnome version an advantage over the Motif version. So what
> next you ask? Well it seems like we are approaching a point at which we
> should release a new version ( beta/alpha/test ) of Gnucash so the
> masses that do not, and will not use CVS versions can check it out. I
> believe Linas will probably cook up a 1.3.x for soon.. Linas?
>
> I think that before we officially release anything that we make RPMS,
> TGZ, DEB, etc... Does anyone else agree with this? And if so can we get
> some suggestions for coordinating such a massive amount of binary
> building? How do other projects do this? Considering that Gnucash is
> difficult to compile in most peoples eyes we should at least attempt to
> distribute some binaries. Maybe we could use VMware to install several
> different distributions, then build for them? Just throwing out
> ideas...
>
> By the way, the RPMS that are on Gnucash.org are by far the most
> downloading file! So its obvious what people want.
>
> Feedback?
>
> --
> Jeremy Collins
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --
> Gnucash Developer's List
> To unsubscribe send empty email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL N1NWH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available
--
Gnucash Developer's List
To unsubscribe send empty email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]