> I think that the reconciliation model is a bit too simple.
> Journal entries are divided into disjoint subsets upon
> entry. We call these "transactions".
> I think that we need to have a separate subsetting for reconciliation.
> Each account would have its own set of reconciliations.
Do you mean 'sets' of reconciliations? Right now, we do have a set
of reconcilations, the set of JEs in an account which have their
reconciled status set. Reconciled status is associated with JEs,
not with transactions.
> Upon entry, the entries would be assigned to the "unreconciled" subset.
> Reconciliation would reassign the entries to a unique subset which correspond
> to the document .
What document is that?
> To begin reconciliation, the user would enter a new transaction which
> consists of two entries "Closing Balance" and "Opening Balance" which would
> credit and debit the reported balance.
> Just as entry transactions must, balance (sum of credits == sum of debits),
> a completed reconciliations must do so also.
Why is this entry needed? Is it marking the reconciliation 'boundaries'
in a sense?
thanks,
dave
--
Gnucash Developer's List
To unsubscribe send empty email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
