Re: gnucash 1.3.7 bugs.

[Bill Gribble]

"Jon A. Christopher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Eliminating single-entry would be a mistake IMHO.  Who wants to learn a
> new system of accounting just to balance their checkbook?  

But my question was, WHAT is it about double-entry that's new?  It
doesn't change the way you use gnucash AT ALL, except that you are
required to have a "category" for every transaction.  Are you
seriously saying that that's too much for you?

> Not me.  I'm a programmer and geek, but for some things, I just want
> to use the bloody software, not become one with it. 

I just don't get it.  I agree that you might not want to go to the
effort to become "at one" with a piece of software, but I can't see
how using double entry fills that description.  I'd appreciate it if
you could explain so I can understand where you are coming from.

Bill Gribble