On 26 Apr 2001 14:14:38 -0700, Dave Peticolas wrote:
> writes:
> >
> > exactly my complaint. the ofx spec could have made this trivial, for
> > us, *and* for intuit, and for MSMoney2000, by getting the FI's to use uuid's
> > for things.
> >
> > I don't get it. We could issue a unique uuid to every molecule on the
> > planet earth and still have plenty left over. I'd like to see uuids stuck
> > on everything.
>
> I though OFX did assing uuids to transactions. In fact, what II recall
> from reading the spec is that both the client & the server could assing
> uuids.
>
> Are they simply optional? Or is qfx a 'simplification' of ofx?
qfx? what is that? Are you sure it is not an earlier version of ofx?
nasa
>
> dave
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.gnumatic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gnumatic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
