Rob Walker wrote:
> cbbrowne> Both options provide a nice big "blech!"
>
> yes, it sucks, but the users are then able to run gnucash. It may be
> 75 to 100 Megs of sucks, but it seems like gnucash needs that many
> megs of libraries and whatnot.
<jumping up and down>
May I make a comment with my tongue stuck so firmly in my cheek that when
I close my mouth I have bitten it off at the root???? Please, plesae??
<jumping up and down/>
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gnumatic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
