On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 16:26 -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote: > Actually, I'm more curious about the branch relations.
I've been doing periodic syncs from HEAD->g2 for the last year or so. At some point the group will decide that what's in the g2 branch should become the main code base that everyone uses, and there will be a single massive collapse (merge) of the g2 branch back into HEAD. > Would this be > committed only to g2 branch for some later massive merge of g2 into > HEAD, or is trivial stuff committed to g2 and then merged to HEAD > immediately? This could either be committed to HEAD and get swept up in the next sync of the g2 branch, or since its trivial and shouldn't cause a sync conflict, it could be double committed. David
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
