On Fri, 2004-12-24 at 07:00 -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote: > On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 06:16:50PM -0500, Josh Sled wrote: > > > > I believe the current desires are best captured by: "get thing working > > under gnome2 first, then later get things working right." > > Ok, is there a list of MUSTFIXes for a g2 release? I checked the > bugzilla: not much about g2. And GNOME2_STATUS mostly says where g2 > is at now, but says little about where it has to get to. Is there an > archived email I didn't find?
No, I've been using the G2 port now and just making notes here locally for stuff that is not working. I made a list of deprecated symbols: http://people.clarkson.edu/~evanchsa/DEPRECATED_SYMBOLS_LIST that I've been working from lately. It's not perfect, GtkCombo shouldn't be changed to GtkComboBox for instance, but you can see that a lot of the changes required have to do with GtkCList. > GNOME2_STATUS mentions quite a handful of register-related minor bugs. > I can infer that these need to be fixed before release. (or do they?) > It seems that you (Josh), and David are both thinking along the same > lines regarding improving the register. But, both of you are thinking > about the "restructuring" coming after the g2 release. Does that mean > you think these bugs will be fixed soon with only minor changes? or > do you think g2 will be released with these bugs and then fixed by the > "restructuring" after the release? For whatever my opinion is worth, I was working with the intent that the first release would be a straight port to GTK+2 while the next release would begin to take advantage of GTK+2 features. I'd like to start reworking the code so that it is easy to maintain; one idea is to removed all of the custom widgets made unnecessary by GTK+2. Stephen _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
