On Sunday 03 April 2005 12:56 am, David Hampton wrote: > On Sun, 2005-04-03 at 00:10 +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > > On Saturday 02 April 2005 11:13 pm, David Hampton wrote: > > > This is gtk-2.4 code. ATM, the g2 branch is still supposed to be based > > > on 2.2. > > > > Where is this documented? > > I don't know that it ever was. We talked on IRC about switching to > gtk-2.4
I'm rarely on IRC - I never particularly liked the medium and there are timezone issues too. I've been asleep during this whole thread and you are probably asleep now that I'm replying. You're 5 hours behind GMT, is that right? 9am here (BST +0100) 3am with you (-0500). > > I'm actually using libgtk2.0-dev 2.6.2-4 so how do I prevent this > > happening? > > What distro? (Just curious. Redhat won't have 2.6 until FC4.) Debian unstable. > > Gtk doesn't do that in the 2.0 API. > > Its in the gtk API docs at http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/gtk/ . > Anything added in gtk-2.4 or later is documented to when it was added to > in the API. OK, I see that now. http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/gtk/gtk-migrating-GtkFileChooser.html Thereagain, until now I didn't now that GnuCash wasn't intended to use 2.4! :-) > > Apart from src/business/business-gnome which is a repeat of the same > > code, does the rest of the QSF stuff build? > > Builds on my FC3 system, but then that's gtk-2.4 based. I'll fire up a > compile on my vmware FC1 system and see how many problems there are. Thanks for doing that. It's good to know it was only this one choice that caused a problem. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.dcglug.org.uk/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/isbnsearch/ http://www.neil.williamsleesmill.me.uk/ http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0x8801094A28BCB3E3
pgpbdkNeymvkV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
